The Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) has closely monitored the renewed controversy surrounding the Paris Club refund and the allegations involving Senator Ned Nwoko. Given the volume of conflicting narratives and the risk of public misinformation, we consider it imperative to present a clear, principled position anchored on law, evidence, and institutional integrity.
At the heart of this matter is a commercial consultancy agreement reportedly entered into between a private firm linked to Senator Nwoko and the Nigerian state, in respect of services rendered in the recovery of Paris Club refunds for states and local governments. Such agreements, by their very nature, are governed by contractual obligations, judicial pronouncements, and administrative processes—not by public sentiment or political convenience.
HURIWA notes that Senator Nwoko has consistently maintained that:
The consultancy engagement was lawful and duly executed;
The matter has been subjected to multiple investigations by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC);
These investigations, reportedly numbering no fewer than four, did not indict him of wrongdoing;
Relevant records exist within key institutions such as the Federal Ministry of Finance and the Central Bank of Nigeria, documenting the transactions and processes involved.
These are serious claims backed, according to him, by institutional documentation. In a democracy governed by the rule of law, such assertions cannot simply be dismissed through anonymous sources, media speculation, or politically motivated commentary.
Burden of Proof Must Rest on the Accusers
HURIWA therefore issues a direct challenge to all individuals, platforms, and interest groups disputing Senator Nwoko’s position:
Publish your documentary evidence.
If there are claims of duplicate payments, improper approvals, or misrepresentation of EFCC findings, such allegations must be supported with verifiable documents placed transparently in the public domain. Anything short of this amounts to conjecture and risks misleading the Nigerian public.
We strongly caution against the dangerous trend where unverified claims are weaponised to damage reputations without due recourse to facts or lawful adjudication.
A Warning Against Politicisation of Commercial Contracts
It is deeply troubling that a matter which is fundamentally commercial and legal is being aggressively politicised. Nigeria must resist the impulse to turn every issue into a political battlefield.
Contracts entered into by government—whether at federal or state level—must be respected, especially where they have been:
Backed by court judgments;
Processed through official financial institutions;
Reviewed by statutory anti-corruption agencies.
To retroactively undermine such agreements on the basis of shifting political narratives would set a dangerous precedent, suggesting that Nigeria is unwilling to honour its obligations. This would severely damage the country’s credibility, deter investors, and weaken confidence in governance systems.
Everything must not be politicised.
Respect for Institutions and Due Process
HURIWA reiterates that institutions such as the EFCC, the Federal Ministry of Finance, and the Central Bank of Nigeria exist precisely to ensure transparency, accountability, and proper documentation of public financial transactions.
Where these institutions have acted, investigated, or issued findings, their positions must be engaged with responsibly—not distorted to suit predetermined narratives.
If there are legitimate disputes over interpretations of EFCC reports or payment structures, such matters should be addressed through:
Judicial clarification;
Official institutional review;
Transparent public disclosure of certified documents.
Trial by media, reliance on unnamed sources, and selective leaks are not substitutes for due process.
Protecting the Rule of Law and National Interest
Nigeria stands at a critical point where strengthening the rule of law is essential for economic stability and democratic consolidation. Allowing politically charged narratives to override contractual obligations and institutional findings would erode the very foundation of governance.
HURIWA therefore calls on:
All parties to exercise restraint and responsibility;
The media to uphold the highest standards of verification and balance;
Relevant authorities to ensure that all facts are transparently presented to the public.
Ultimately, if Senator Nwoko is wrong, the law provides clear mechanisms for accountability. If he is right, then attempts to malign him through unsubstantiated allegations must cease.
Conclusion
This matter must be resolved on the basis of law, facts, and verifiable records—not speculation or political bias. Nigeria’s integrity, both domestically and internationally, depends on our collective commitment to these principles.
HURIWA will continue to advocate for justice, transparency, and the protection of lawful engagements, irrespective of personalities involved.
Signed:
Comrade Emmanuel Onwubiko
National Coordinator
Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA)
19th April, 2026
